Legislation concerning raw milk sales is evolving, with 27 states permitting various distribution methods, but concerns from experts regarding safety persist.
A 2022 report showed that nearly 5% of U.S. adults consumed raw milk within the past year, yet it's crucial to acknowledge the associated risks, which, according to nutrition experts, could even result in fatalities in certain instances.
Claims About the Benefits of Raw Milk
Raw milk is unprocessed and has not undergone pasteurization, a heating process that kills bacteria. Advocates contend that raw milk is more nutritious, making it a superior choice for those with certain health conditions. The introduction of pasteurization in the 1920s aimed to enhance milk safety by reducing bacteria, but proponents argue it has drawbacks.
This process was a response to a bovine tuberculosis outbreak in the early 1900s. While some believe pasteurization no longer serves a purpose, most of their claims about the benefits of raw milk lack scientific support. Here are some of them:
- Pasteurized milk retains most nutrients, with only minor losses in water-soluble vitamins B1, B6, B9, B12, and C, while fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E, and K see minimal decreases during pasteurization. Milk is still a rich source of calcium and phosphorus post-pasteurization.
- Fatty acid profiles in raw and pasteurized milk are largely similar, and pasteurization may enhance the digestibility of fatty acids.
- Pasteurization does not significantly reduce protein levels, with casein remaining heat-stable. Whey protein is minimally affected by pasteurization, and studies suggest that proteins from pasteurized milk are biologically active.
- Raw milk may have immune-modulating effects, potentially reducing the risk of asthma and allergic conditions, but it's important to note these associations are not direct correlations.
- Although raw milk contains lactase-producing bacteria that could theoretically aid lactose digestion, studies have not shown significant differences in digestive symptoms between raw and pasteurized milk.
- Both raw and pasteurized milk contain antimicrobials that help control harmful microbes, with some reduction in lactoperoxidase activity due to pasteurization, but overall antimicrobial content remains relatively stable.
Dangers of Consuming Raw Milk
Raw milk carries significant health risks due to potential contamination by harmful pathogens, making it one of the riskiest foods available. Consuming raw milk can lead to severe, sometimes life-threatening illnesses, including Guillain-Barré syndrome, which can result in paralysis, and Hemolytic uremic syndrome, a condition associated with kidney failure, stroke, and even death.
While the symptoms of foodborne illnesses from raw milk vary depending on the type of pathogen ingested, individuals can fall ill even after consuming the same brand and source of raw milk they've previously consumed without any issues.
Pasteurization reduces risk of getting an illness from raw milk. Yet, it raw milk can be contaminated by contact with healthy animals carrying harmful germs, particularly through fecal matter, despite safety precautions.
The greatest vulnerability to raw milk-related illnesses lies with specific groups, such as adults aged 65 and older, children under 5 years old, and individuals with weakened immune systems. Nonetheless, even healthy individuals of any age can experience severe illnesses after consuming raw milk tainted with harmful pathogens.
Therefore, opting for pasteurized milk and milk products is a safer choice, given that raw milk and its derivatives, including soft cheese, ice cream, and yogurt, can harbor germs that lead to severe illnesses, hospitalization, or death. If someone has consumed raw milk and subsequently falls ill, seeking immediate medical attention is crucial to address potential health risks.
RELATED ARTICLE: Choosing the Right Milk: Navigating the Health Benefits of Dairy-Free Alternatives in a Sea of Options
Check out more news and information on Milk in Science Times.