It is rare to see that scientists are challenging the climate change report of the United Nations, and wants to fund "red teams". The fact is quite surprising, but true.
Stars and Stripes reported that some scientists who are studying the climate science have urged the Congress to fund "red teams". The aim is to find out the natural cause behind the climate change and also to challenge the United Nations' panel on climate science. This concept is presented by the scientists who raise questions about the human influence on global warming.
This incident happens at a time when the U.S. President Donald Trump and key members of the administration explore doubt about the accepted climate narrative. John Christy, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, supports the funding and credibility of the "red teams". He opines that such teams can offer the significant and different conclusions about the human influence on climate change.
While participating in the recent House Science committee hearings the scientists have provided testimony challenging the current process to measure the climate change. The majority of the scientists believes that organization like IPCC provides biased views about the significant changes related to climate. The scientists have opined that a group of experts that challenges the accepted and common climate narrative can only bring proper assessment. In a word, they want the activeness of the "red teams".
"Red teams" are those special groups that play an important role to develop the performance of an organization. Intelligence agencies like the CIA and the Defense Department sometimes use these groups. Though, different opinions come from Peter Frumhoff, the director who prepares the policy and science for the Union of Concerned Scientists. He ridicules the concept of using the special groups to analyze the accepted report on climate change.
Peter Frumhoff utters that the scientific community has already established its perfection. Michael Mann, the climate scientist of Pennsylvania State University, says that every scientific work needs evidence. It is now a clear fact that a new twist is now going to take place about the "red teams" and climate change.
Meanwhile, the Vatican requested the U'S' President Donald Trump to reconsider his current position on climate change, AOL News reported. When funding a scientific research is becoming a tough task, then using the "red teams" is not an easy job to do. It is an obvious fact the human activity always provides some influences on climate change.
It is difficult to ignore that global warming is a very sensitive issue and proper solution to this problem needs more study about climate change. But, the question is whether "red teams" can really bring some positive results or not if applied. People should wait to see the next development of the current situation.
