Ship Emission Reduction Has Inadvertently Exacerbated Global Warming, Study Reveals

According to a new study, efforts to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions could have caused 80% of the gauged increase in heat uptake on the planet since 2020.

This means that the shipping industry's efforts to reduce air pollution have inadvertently exacerbated global warming.

Efforts to Reduce Ship Emissions Boost Global Warming Instead

Global warming appeared to be exacerbated in the short term. Based on a novel climate model, it also appeared to contribute to sea temperatures that break levels.

Shipping regulations worldwide have slashed cargo ship emissions of sulfur dioxide by a whopping 80%. However, the rapid sulfur pollution reduction could have inadvertently created a geoengineering termination shock that yielded global effects.

The researchers noted that the warming impact matches the recent strong warming in 2023. It is also expected to make the 2020s warm anomalously.

The magnitude of such warming is equivalent to 80% of the gauged increase in the planet's heart uptake since 2020.

The researchers also noted that this pollution reduction could double the warming rate by the 2020s compared to the rate since 1980. These were pointed out in the "Abrupt reduction in shipping emission as an inadvertent geoengineering termination shock produces substantial radiative warming" study.

In 2020, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) implemented new regulations that reduced shipping fuel's maximum sulfur content from 3.5% to 0.5%. This was done to enhance air quality and prevent roughly 30,000 premature deaths a year.

However, aerosols, like particles of sulfur dioxide, are extremely reflective. When they are released, they settle into the stratosphere and bounce the sun's rays back to space. At times, they could serve as a massive sunblock for the planet.

Hence, when the regulations ended up ending decades of huge pollution, they started the unintended experiment of geoengineering. Since March 2023, sulfurous fog loss and higher global warming due to several factors have increased the sea's average surface temperatures to record-breaking levels.

Findings Scrutinized

However, other climate scientists have disputed some of the study's conclusions. Director Gavin Schmidt from NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies said that while researchers think their projections for the higher solar energy that enters the atmosphere are quite accurate, he thinks this is not the case.

Schmidt noted an analysis by climate scientist Zeke Hausfather from the Breakthrough Institute. This analysis argues that the study's warming calculations depend on an oversimplified model that misunderstands ocean heat uptake. This means that the sulfur reduction's global warming effects could be overstated.

The director added that they are still awaiting updated reports regarding other aerosol emissions, the HTHH (Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai) volcanic eruption, the solar cycle, and other aspects of internal variability.

Such findings arrive at a time when governments are looking into SRM (solar radiation management) techniques, which aim to dim sunlight that reaches the Earth by intentionally releasing aerosols.

However, Schmidt thinks that such methods do not hold any viability.

Measures For Countering Global Warming

The study sparked crucial questions regarding whether marine cloud brightening holds potential as a geoengineering technique for countering global warming.

However, it also recognized the difficulties associated with these interventions and stressed the importance of considering the practical and ethical implications of such efforts.

The researchers also explained that the warming effect of reduced sulfur dioxide emissions could be temporary. Natural processes could replenish the sulfur dioxide content of the atmosphere.

Nevertheless, the study's findings stress the importance of carefully considering the possible unintended consequences of policies implemented for the environment.

Check out more news and information on Environment & Climate in Science Times.