Diana Kutsa: Implementing the Right Tools Is Not Enough

Diana Kutsa
Diana Kutsa

Analysts predict that one of the main trends for 2025 will be microservice-based software solutions, which divide applications into smaller, independent parts, allowing them to evolve separately. A recent Devoncroft survey highlights this as a leading trend. However, managing the complexity and scalability of microservice architectures in large enterprises presents challenges, particularly in maintaining high availability, performance, and security. Diana Kutsa, a DevOps Engineer at BMC Software, shares her expertise on optimizing CI/CD pipelines for microservices in Kubernetes and managing centralized logging and event monitoring to ensure reliable system management.

Diana, with your experience in DevOps, especially in Kubernetes, CI/CD, and infrastructure optimization, what do you see as the main challenge in managing the complexity and scaling of microservices?
Managing microservices is about mastering the balance between automation, observability, scalability, and security. By weaving these principles into every layer of the architecture, you ensure that your system is resilient, responsive, and future-proof.

Let's start with observability. At BMC Software, you implemented a centralized logging solution using Fluent Bit and Helm in your Kubernetes clusters, integrating it with Prometheus and Grafana to visualize key metrics. What did this achieve?
Effective microservice management requires a deep understanding of their real-time performance. This calls for building comprehensive observability systems that combine metrics, logs, and trace data. Tools like Prometheus, Grafana, the ELK Stack, Jaeger, and Zipkin provide system-wide visibility. However, simply implementing these tools is not enough—you also need to integrate them into an overarching monitoring ecosystem to deliver timely alerts and access to analytical data. The setup we deployed allowed us to monitor system health in real time, quickly identify bottlenecks, and resolve issues before they affected users. This experience enables me to recommend implementing a unified observability system that combines logs, metrics, and tracing for comprehensive monitoring and faster incident response.

The next aspect is the automation of configuration and infrastructure management. In recent years, you've automated CI/CD pipelines using Jenkins, Terraform, and Ansible. What benefits did this bring?
The more microservices there are, the more complex it becomes to manage their configurations, deployments, and scaling. Infrastructure as Code (IaC) approaches enable automation of infrastructure management through tools like Terraform, Ansible, or Pulumi. These tools allow for versioning and tracking infrastructure changes, automating deployment processes. However, automation should go further—CI/CD processes need to be designed to minimize deployment time, provide fast feedback on changes, and eliminate human error. This requires not just adopting modern tools but also rethinking development processes to integrate automation from the outset. In our case, deployment times were significantly reduced, and the potential for human error was minimized. Automating Kubernetes cluster provisioning on platforms such as Oracle, AWS, and GCP enabled us to maintain consistent environments and ensure reliability. These projects underscore my ability to design effective automation workflows that simplify infrastructure management and improve deployment processes.

Next point is scalability and load balancing. You've managed Kubernetes clusters at BMC, ensuring auto-scaling for varying workloads, and integrated Istio for dynamic load balancing, resilience, and efficient microservice traffic routing. How would you assess the importance of this?
One of the key aspects of microservice architectures is the ability to dynamically scale in response to changing workloads. Container orchestrators like Kubernetes enable automatic scaling, which significantly eases infrastructure management. However, to fully leverage scaling capabilities, service mesh solutions—such as Istio or Linkerd—are necessary. They provide traffic routing, load balancing, resilience, and observability at the network layer between microservices. This offers infrastructure flexibility and reliability but requires deep expertise in configuring and maintaining these solutions. My experience in ensuring infrastructure scalability and flexibility allows me to guide teams in setting up dynamic scaling and load balancing to maintain system resilience during peak loads.

Finally, security and access management. At BMC, you integrated DevSecOps practices into your CI/CD pipelines, automating security checks such as vulnerability scanning, secret management, and the implementation of a zero-trust model. What impact did this have?
The more microservices there are, the more entry points into the system, and each one must be secured. Integrating DevSecOps practices, which automate security throughout the CI/CD pipeline, helps minimize risks and protect systems from potential threats. This includes vulnerability scanning, monitoring for security compliance, secret management, and access control. A zero-trust model should be implemented to ensure that every request is authenticated and authorized, regardless of its source. By doing this, we minimized security risks and maintained high compliance standards in our microservice architecture. My practical experience in automating security throughout the development lifecycle enables me to confidently recommend security strategies for protecting complex distributed systems.

We understand that you are currently in the process of registering a patent titled "Method for Automated Optimization of CI/CD Pipelines Using AI-Based Performance Analysis." How does this method work?
Throughout my work at BMC Software, one of the ongoing challenges has been ensuring the efficiency and scalability of CI/CD pipelines as system complexity grows. As the number of microservices increases and deployments become more frequent, traditional methods of managing these pipelines often fall short. Bottlenecks in builds, inefficient resource usage, and manual intervention can slow down the entire development process, affecting both performance and system reliability. This is where my upcoming patent comes into play. To address these challenges, I am currently implementing a solution titled "Method for Automated Optimization of CI/CD Pipelines Using AI-Based Analysis of Pipeline Performance." This patent introduces a way to harness AI not only to monitor but actively optimize CI/CD pipelines in real time.

Given all these aspects, what would you recommend as an expert?
First, focus on automating all infrastructure management processes: implementing IaC and CI/CD automation can significantly reduce time spent and minimize risks related to human error. Second, use modern orchestration and service mesh tools; this will provide infrastructure flexibility and reliability, along with the ability to scale dynamically and adapt to changing conditions. Finally, build a unified observability system: integrate metrics, logs, and tracing into a single platform to gain a full understanding of system health and respond quickly to incidents.

Ultimately, success in managing microservice architectures depends not just on selecting the right tools but also on fostering a culture of automation, security, and continuous improvement within DevOps/SRE teams.

What are your predictions for microservice architecture trends in 2025 and beyond?
I'm envisioning the following development. AI-Powered Automation: AI will play a central role in automating both infrastructure management and CI/CD pipelines. My work on AI-driven pipeline optimization is a glimpse of how systems will become self-improving, allowing organizations to scale rapidly while minimizing inefficiencies. Proactive Observability: AI and machine learning will not only monitor system performance but also predict potential issues before they arise, shifting from reactive to proactive incident management. Zero-Trust Security Architectures: As the number of microservices increases, so do the potential attack vectors. Security models will shift towards zero-trust architectures, ensuring that each microservice interaction is verified and encrypted, regardless of internal or external origin. Hybrid Cloud and Serverless Deployments: With the growing adoption of hybrid cloud environments and serverless microservices, orchestration tools like Kubernetes and service meshes will need to evolve to manage these increasingly distributed, ephemeral workloads.

By staying ahead of these trends and embracing AI-driven solutions, companies can ensure their microservices architectures are secure, scalable, and future-ready.

Join the Discussion

Recommended Stories

Real Time Analytics