The persistent belief in an unidentified primate species in North America, often referred to as Bigfoot or Sasquatch, continues despite the prevalence of high-quality cameras.
A recent study, titled "Bigfoot: If it's there, could it be a bear?" published in the Journal of Zoology, proposes that many reported sightings of this legendary creature might be misidentifications of American black bears standing upright. Analysis of earlier reports shows that Bigfoot sightings increase up to 4% per 1,000 bears.
Decoding Bigfoot: Analyzing Sightings Across North America
Bigfoot is typically reported to have a height ranging from 1.8 to 2.7 meters (6 to 9 feet), a dimension akin to adult black bears standing on their hind legs, which generally range in height from 1.2 to 2 meters.
In the study, data scientist Floe Foxon noted that while the research does not conclusively negate the existence of Bigfoot, it does lend weight to the notion that a considerable number of reported sightings might have more ordinary explanations.
Expanding beyond the Pacific Northwest, Foxon's analysis builds upon previous research linking Bigfoot sightings to black bear populations and covers the entire United States and Canada.
Utilizing a model that considers human population distribution and forested areas, Foxon's findings demonstrate a significant correlation between Bigfoot sightings and black bear populations across states and provinces, indicating a 4% increase in sightings for every 1,000 black bears in a given area. For instance, in 2006, the model estimated an average of one Bigfoot sighting for every 5,000 black bears.
To assess Bigfoot sightings, Foxon relied on data from the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization, cross-referencing it with national census data on human populations and forest coverage estimates from the US and Canadian governments. Although certain regions may have high Bigfoot sighting numbers with fewer bears, the seeming contradiction is clarified when considering the human population and forested area in each state or province simultaneously.
In states like Florida, where bears and forests are scarce, but the human population is high, the increased frequency of Bigfoot sightings may be attributed to a greater number of people who could mistake other phenomena for the elusive creature. Foxon stresses that a straightforward comparison of bears to Bigfoot is complicated by variations in human population and forest coverage.
Findings Help in Tracking Black Bear Population
Similar to enthusiasts of other mysterious creatures like the Loch Ness monster, those intrigued by Bigfoot heavily rely on anecdotal accounts, blurry footage, and footprints to support the existence of an unclassified creature. However, the lack of tangible evidence, such as bones or teeth, diminishes the credibility of these reports.
Due to the dearth of concrete proof, the scientific community does not attribute Bigfoot sightings to the presence of an unidentified creature. While bears may not explain every reported encounter, correlations like these contribute to the argument that many sightings could be attributed to scientifically recognized phenomena.
Beyond the attempt to comprehend reported encounters with enigmatic creatures, the study offers additional advantages. Bigfoot sightings could indirectly provide insights into black bear populations, assisting scientists in monitoring and conserving these animals.
Foxon suggests that, although in the early stages, these findings propose that sasquatch sightings might have potential utility in bear conservation efforts as a form of citizen science.
RELATED ARTICLE: Woman Claims She Caught in Camera a Real-life Bigfoot Sneaking In Her Ranch; Do They Really Exist?
Check out more news and information on Bigfoot in Science Times.
