All over the world, scientists and advocates seek to keep carbon in the ground as a way to stop climate change. However, in Colorado and New Mexico, oil companies would obtain more crude by doing the opposite-drilling carbon dioxide reserves out of the ground.
After getting these reserves from natural source underground fields, the gas is piped to the Permian Basin, which consists of top-producing oil fields in the US-those located in West Texas and southeastern New Mexico. Oil companies utilize carbon dioxide to flood their wells, forcing the last crude dregs to the surface, which is part of the process called enhanced oil recovery (EOR).
Carbon flooding is a way to recover available oil, offering power while the energy sector moves away from fossil fuels. At times, oil companies mention carbon flooding together with carbon capture technology, which suggests that pulling carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and push it underground into oil wells to store it permanently-and to free up remaining crude for removal-would enable a "carbon neutral" oil production.
Carbon Flooding Fallacy
Such a picture, however, of carbon flooding is considered a fallacy. The very first barrel of carbon-neutral oil was only produced by Occidental Petroleum earlier this year. And such depended on carbon offsets, instead of direct capture of carbon dioxide and injection into wells.
What's real is that this less-known process utilizes mostly carbon dioxide taken from natural sources where it would otherwise have stayed safely underground, not risking atmosphere emissions or adding to the use of fossil fuels.
While the industry is not in the dedicated view of watchdogs and observers, it has been in existence for about four decades with a massive scale.
Carbon flooding and drilling have been in existence in the US for decades and expected to grow. As such, these oil companies have enjoyed the backing of both major political parties and President Joe Biden.
Part of the nearly 5,600-page COVID-19 relief bill passed late last year is additional tax credits for CCUS (carbon capture, utilization, and storage), which is a suite of processes of which carbon flooding is considered the most prominent "utilization" piece. The bill also accelerates permitting CCUS infrastructure, such as carbon dioxide pipelines. Lawmakers have since introduced additional legislation along similar lines, and this includes the SCALE Act.
Carbon Flooding's Environmental Issues, Climate Dangers, Health Hazards
However, carbon flooding is not the harmless technology that politicians and companies want it to be. A study, "Possible contribution of carbon dioxide flooding to global environmental issues" bares that it has significant existing climate dangers and health hazards.
The Independent Press Telegram reported a total of 17 people were killed when a poisonous byproduct gas, hydrogen sulfide (H2S) escaped from an injection well in 1975. A US Environmental Protection Agency Report to Congress on Hydrogen Sulfide Air Emissions Associated with the Extraction of Oil and Natural Gas points to 10 other H2S leaks from oil and gas drillings between 1974 and 1993, killing animals, such as groups of cows and moose, jackrabbits and blackbirds. While no humans were reported killed, the threat remained.
The Wire quoted Jimbo Buickerood of the San Juan Citizens Alliance, an advocacy group against the carbon dioxide drilling in San Juan County in New Mexico and Montezuma County in Colorado said, "Where they're drilling and the H2S might be there, you need to have a [respirator] mask. It can kill you."
Even so, the industry continues this unsafe practice. As the Permian is famous for the companies' utilization of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, for oil, it's also the place where companies use carbon dioxide taken from underground fields called domes in New Mexico and Colorado and funneled to flood oil wells, that leads to an 8 to 20 percent more oil on the surface.
About 80 percent of oil taken through carbon flooding in the US is done using gas acquired from the domes in New Mexico and Colorado, a 2015 US Department of Energy report said. Although the amount would differ from year to year, 2.9 percent of daily domestic oil production was from carbon flooding in 2018, according to a Denbury Resources report.
As such, carbon flooding could help oil firms regain 284 more barrels of oil, said an Advanced Resources International report.
Hyped as a Possible Climate Solution
Currently, carbon flooding is hyped as a possible climate solution because a portion of the carbon dioxide utilized is sent back underground, thereby keeping it off the atmosphere where it can add to global warming. Oil companies have viewed the process as a way to extend the duration of their wells.
It can also be captured at an emissions source, such as a power plant, and funneled safely to an oil field. But while a portion of the gas used in carbon flooding emanates from capturing carbon dioxide from the emissions sources, such technology is costly and unproven, and this would leave much of the recovery to carbon dioxide drilled from locations where it should have stayed underground.
The carbon flooding process would conclude between 3.7 and 4.7 metric tons of carbon dioxide emitted for every metric ton of carbon dioxide drilled into the Earth, according to the report, "Study Questions Lifecycle Emissions Benefits of Using CO2 for Enhanced Oil Recovery as a Method for Carbon Sequestration." Fewer than 0.2 metric tons of carbon dioxide gets placed underground for each barrel of oil.
Despite these studies, however, the US Environmental Protection Agency mandated that carbon dioxide drilling sites self-report emissions data if the site emits over 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide per year. The Wire notes however that the EPA has yet to take any enforcement action against companies in the carbon drilling space.
RELATED ARTICLE : World's Richest Person Elon Musk Is Offering $100M Prize for Best Carbon Capture Technology
Check out more news and information on Carbon Emissions on Science Times.
