Harvard Scientist Claims Discovery of Extraterrestrial Evidence in Pacific Ocean, Drawing Skepticism

Avi Loeb, a physicist and researcher specializing in the search for extraterrestrial life from Harvard University, thinks he has uncovered evidence of something originating from beyond our Solar System in the depths of the Pacific Ocean.

However, a fellow scientist British planetary expert Monica Grady expressed skepticism in a comprehensive critique she recently published. Grady believes that Loeb's conclusions appear somewhat inconsistent.

Yuri Milner And Stephen Hawking Announce Breakthrough Starshot, A New Space Exploration Initiative — Avi Loeb, Frank B. Baird, Jr. Professor of Science at Harvard University speaks on stage as Yuri Milner and Stephen Hawking host press conference to announce Breakthrough Starshot, a new space exploration initiative, at One World Observatory on April 12, 2016 in New York City. Bryan Bedder/Getty Images for Breakthrough Prize Foundation

Inconsistencies in Loeb's Extraterrestrial Evidence

Grady specifically challenges Loeb's assertion that the small "spherules" discovered in the Pacific Ocean's depths, identified as fragments of either IM1 (an interstellar meteorite that fell into the ocean in 2014) or possibly remnants of an extraterrestrial probe, are supported by their chemical composition analysis.

Although she acknowledges the validity of Loeb's chemical analysis, Grady suggests that he may have misidentified the source of hese spherules.

She highlights that the region off the coast of Papua New Guinea, where Loeb found these minuscule fragments, is relatively close to the Marshall Islands, where the US conducted numerous nuclear tests over half a century ago. She suggests that the spherules might actually be fallout from these nuclear tests, akin to a human-generated supernova, rather than of extraterrestrial origin.

To validate the origin of the spherules found by Loeb, Grady suggests a practical test: examining the beach sands and ocean floor around Bikini Atoll and Enewetak, where the historic nuclear tests occurred. This would provide crucial insights into whether these spherules might be the result of fallout from those tests.

Additionally, Grady proposes a more precise method involving the measurement of their "oxygen isotopic composition," which can conclusively distinguish between terrestrial and extraterrestrial materials based on the ratios of stable oxygen isotopes. She offers to facilitate this analysis, provided the spherules are not radioactive.

While acknowledging the speculative nature of her explanation, Grady maintains her skepticism about Loeb's claims regarding the spherules. After examining the available evidence, she remains unconvinced that the materials are either linked to IM1 or originate from an alien spacecraft, echoing her previous doubts about Loeb's findings.

Frequency and Composition of Interstellar Objects

Scientists estimate there are about a quadrillion interstellar objects within the cubic parsec of space around the Sun, a relatively small region. Interstellar objects can enter the Solar System if they undergo the right gravitational interactions, and they typically appear as comets or asteroids upon arrival.

However, their hyperbolic orbits reveal their interstellar origin, distinguishing them from our Solar System's native objects. Studying these interstellar objects, which can be much larger than typical interstellar dust particles, provides valuable insights into the chemistry of distant planetary systems.

Loeb and his team's claims of finding hundreds of small metallic spheres on the seafloor near Papua New Guinea, suggesting they originated from an interstellar meteorite that hit Earth in 2014, were disputed by some experts. They argue that the flash observed during the 2014 atmospheric entry cannot definitively confirm an interstellar origin, and that very little of such a meteorite would survive re-entry.

Additionally, the chemical composition of the spheres, particularly the presence of beryllium, lanthanum, and uranium, is not considered a definitive indicator of interstellar origin. Instead, scientists recommend analyzing oxygen isotopes, as they can provide more conclusive evidence of the object's origin.

In conclusion, while the discovery of interstellar objects is essential for understanding distant planetary systems, the claim regarding the Papua New Guinea spheres is met with skepticism from some experts who emphasize the need for more precise measurements and additional analyses, particularly regarding oxygen isotopes, to confirm their interstellar origin.